PLM v. E. Randle Co.’s Empirical Analysis
797 F.2d 204 · 1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2018
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 341 So. 2d 1327 - Carolina Transformer Co., Inc. v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“authorized to resume all activities as though said suspension had not been imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he phrase 'to resume all activities as though said suspension had not been imposed' implies that those activities were interrupted and does not imply that the interruption was fictional. The phrase does not imply a retroactive dispensation from the suspension....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.