Espinoza v. Dimon’s Empirical Analysis
797 F.3d 229 · 2015
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Ross v. Bernhard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a shareholder demands that a board of directors investigate both an underlying wrongdoing' and subsequent misstatements by corporate officers about that wrongdoing, what factors should a court consider in deciding whether the board acted in a grossly negligent fashion by focusing its investigation solely on the underlying wrongdoing? 1”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“have expressed doubt about the wisdom of reviewing Rule 23.1 dismissals for abuse of discretion rather than de novo”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The adequacy of particularized allegations under Rule 9(b) is ... case- and context-specific ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.