Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 F.3d 364 - Clay v. Emmi

Clay v. Emmi’s Empirical Analysis

797 F.3d 364 · 2015

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Graham v. Connor · Scott v. Harris · Johnson v. Jones · Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n light of Kingsley , under either amendment, the court would employ the same objective test for excessive force.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “excessive force claim brought under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is subject to the same objective standard as an excessive force claim brought under the Fourth Amendment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the officers' actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.