Allred v. Allred’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Hall v. Hall (1993), Adams v. Board of Review of Indus. Com'n (1991)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Acton v. Deliran · Stevens v. Stevens · Woodward v. Woodward · Jefferies v. Jefferies · Hansen v. Hansen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not intend our remand to be merely an exercise in bolstering and supporting the conclusion already reached.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The guidelines apply to any judicial or administrative order establishing or modifying an award of child support entered on or after July 1, 1989. (2) (a) The child support guidelines shall be applied as a rebuttable presumption in establishing or modifying the amount of temporary or permanent child support. (b) The rebuttable presumption means the provisions and considerations required by the guidelines, the award amounts resulting from the application of the guidelines, and the use of worksheets consistent with these guidelines are presumed to be correct, unless rebutted under the provisions of this section. (3) A written finding or specific finding on the record supporting the conclusion that complying with a provision of the guidelines or ordering an award amount resulting from use of the guidelines would be unjust, inappropriate, or not in the best interest of a child in a particular case is sufficient to rebut the presumption in that case....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boyce v. Goble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.