People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2020
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schubert v. People · People v. Jones · Massey v. People · People v. Freeman · Castro v. DIST. COURT OF TENTH JUDICIAL DIST.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[If the defendant is sentenced to confinement in a facility not under the supervision of the Department of Corrections, it is within the discretion of the trial court whether to give the defendant eredit for pre-sen-tence confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Smith“Duplicative credits ... not only would reward the multiple offender but also would vitiate, to the extent of such credit, the statutory penalty applicable to the crime for which a particular sentence is imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Norton“Generally, when consecutive sentences are imposed, crediting the period of presentence confinement against one of the sentences will assure the defendant full ered-it against the total term of imprisonment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Roy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.