Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 P.2d 42 - People v. Gregory

People v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Susman · People v. Fahrney · People v. Gregory

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1, EDWARD J. ESSAY, JR. attorney registration number 09888 is DISBARRED from the practice of law effective thirty-one days from the date of this Order and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. 2. -On or before May 15, 2002, Edward J, Essay, Jr. shall pay the following sums, plus interest at the statutory rate from the date of this Order; a. To Michael Gross the sum of $45,600 with interest from August 17, 2000; b. To the Attorneys' Fund for Client Protection, all sums paid out by the fund in connection with the matters set forth in the Complaints with interest from the date of disbursement; c. To Madison Morgan the sum of $348 with statutory interest from March 31, 1998; d. To Donald Meyer the sum of $1,517 with statutory interest from July 31, 1998; e. To Kevin Pidgeon the sum of $300 with statutory interest from September 80, 1997; . £. To Charles Von Fossen the sum of $1,500 with statutory interest from June 9, 1999. 3. Essay is ORDERED to pay the costs of these proceedings; 4, The People shall submit a Statement of Costs within fifteen (15) day of the date of this Order. Respondent shall have ten (10) days thereafter to submit a response thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.