Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 P.2d 431 - State v. Robinson

State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably State v. Pena (1994), State v. Thurman (1993)

45 state decisions

370199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). As we stated in Lopez : [A]n officer conducting a routine traffic stop may request a driver's license and vehicle registration, conduct a computer check, and issue a citation. However, once the driver has produced a valid driver's license and evidence of entitlement to use the vehicle,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[aln officer conducting a routine traffic stop may request a driver's license and vehicle registration, conduct a computer check, and issue a citation. However, once the driver has produced a valid license and evidence of entitlement to use the vehicle, "he must be allowed to proceed on his way, without being subject to further delay by police for additional questioning." Any further temporary detention for investigative questioning after the fulfillment of the purpose for the initial traffic stop is justified under the fourth amendment only if the detaining officer has a reasonable suspicion of serious criminal activity. The detaining officer must be able to articulate a particularized and objective basis for their suspicions that is drawn from the totality of cireumstances facing them at the time of the seizure.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “avoidance of eye contact, is consistent with innocent as well as criminal behavior,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.