Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 P.2d 754 - People v. Broom

People v. Broom’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2021

4 state decisions

201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Wallin · People v. Dillon · Miller v. People · Lowe v. People · People v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under Colorado law, the jury must be instructed on that portion of the definition applicable to the prosecution's evidence). Lajala further contends that there is a reasonable possibility that the Circuit Court's instructional error might have contributed to her conviction, such that the error is not 13 FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The State, on the other hand, argues that the record on appeal, which does not include the trial transcripts, is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.