Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 P.2d 774 - People v. Pack

People v. Pack’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2021

6 state decisions

201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boswell, Inc. v. Harkins · Balltrip v. People · People v. Schwartz · People v. Becker · People v. Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The instruction was worded in the language of the statute, and our supreme court has held that there is no prejudice in instructing the jury of all sections of a theft statute, even though some sections did not apply to defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.