Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 533 So. 2d 418 - Woodward v. State · Hobson v. State · 608 So. 2d 1129 - McGee v. State · 443 So. 2d 869 - Stinson v. State · 643 So. 2d 501 - Ferrill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is, in fact, difficult to envision a trial of multiple charges where some evidence relevant to one charge would not be subject to a Rule 404(b) challenge as to the other charge, no matter how closely related in time and circumstance the two alleged crimes might be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was indicted in a single multi-count indictment for armed robbery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and drug possession. Wright sought to have all three counts severed for separate trials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) the offenses are based on the same act or transaction; or (b) the offenses are based on two (2) or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.