Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

797 So. 2d 1108

Gresham v. Gresham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 2001-05-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on 678 So. 2d 118 - Albertson v. Albertson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CRAWLEY, Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I must respectfully dissent. In my opinion, because issues of property division and alimony are so interrelated that this court must consider the entire judgment together when reviewing the alimony issue, see Albertson v. Albertson, 678 So.2d 118, 120 (Ala.Civ.App.1995), I do not believe that the trial court should be limited on remand to making only a periodic-alimony award. Instead, I believe we should reverse the entire judgment as it relates to the property-division and alimony issues and allow the trial court several options as it attempts to fashion a more equitable judgment.

/797/so2d/1108 · .json · Public domain