797 So. 2d 1252 - Hope v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Heggs v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 760 So. 2d 924 - Trapp v. State · 715 So. 2d 960 - Hyden v. State · Hope v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was valid. See id. at 1253. The Fourth District also affirmed the addition of thirty points to Hope's scoresheet for a prior serious felony (which was not available on the 1994 scoresheet) because it found that Hope did not preserve that issue for review. See id. Essentially, this Court remanded Hope to the Fourth District to review whether all of the trial court's departure reasons were valid and to make a determination about Hope's Heggs claim, as it was properly raised on appeal. We did not remand Hope for a determination regarding whether the trial court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“after the recalculation of his scoresheet under the [1994] sentencing guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.