Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 SO2D 356 - Boyd v. State

Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Blackledge v. Allison · Kercheval v. United States · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a movant could, at a later date, successfully contradict his own assertions made under oath at his plea[-]acceptance hearing, then there would be no purpose in conducting the hearing ■ at all. “Truth” would become an illusory concept meaning nothing more than what the declarant asserted it to be at any particular point in time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.