Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 SO2D 368 - Stringer v. Crowson

Stringer v. Crowson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 611 So. 2d 942 - Rodgers v. Pascagoula Public School Dist. · 606 So. 2d 114 - Odom v. Roberts · Biloxi Electric Co. v. Thorn · 738 So. 2d 742 - Maddox v. Muirhead · Ross-King-Walker, Inc. v. Henson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our supreme court has also held that jury awards are not merely advisory and will not under the general rule be set aside unless so unreasonable as to strike mankind at first blush as being beyond all measure, unreasonable in amount and outrageous. Wallace v. Thornton, 672 So.2d 724, 729 (Miss.1996).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court finds that the jury was influenced by bias, prejudice, or passion, or ... if the damages were contrary to the overwhelming weight of credible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.