¶1Although we agree with appellant that the complained-of evidentiary ruling concerning Mr. Jowers’ proffered testimony was erroneous, in light of all the other *639evidence in this case, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
¶2AFFIRMED.
797 So. 2d 638
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 19, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-10-19
Decided 2001-10-19