Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 SO2D 700 - McClendon v. Bel

McClendon v. Bel’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Messer v. London · 612 So. 2d 107 - Autin v. Terrebonne · 709 So. 2d 269 - Herpin v. Boudreaux · Herpin v. Boudreaux · 612 So. 2d 842 - Sheets v. Sheets

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person may maintain more than one residence and the fact that one is maintained for political purposes does not itself prevent the residence from being actual and bona fide. Intent to maintain a residence is an important factor, but intent alone does not establish a bona fide residence. There must be actual, physical use or occupation of quarters for living purposes before residence is established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is in the parish wherein he has his principal establishment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.