Acker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 585 So. 2d 660 - Willie v. State · Peterson v. State · 607 So. 2d 1184 - Wallace v. State · 549 So. 2d 1316 - Gray v. State · 445 So. 2d 815 - House v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our law is clear that an appellant must present to us a record sufficient to show the occurrence of the error he asserts and also that the matter was properly presented to the trial court and timely preserved.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is no hearing transcript, and therefore no basis to support Acker's claim that the trial court erroneously denied her motion. Because of this fact, the presumption that the judgment of the trial court was correct must prevail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]here is a presumption that the judgment of the trial court is correct and the burden is on the Appellant to demonstrate some reversible error to this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.