Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 SW2D 103 - Hickey v. Couchman

Hickey v. Couchman’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc. (1997), Aquila Southwest Pipeline, Inc. v. Harmony Exploration, Inc. (2001)

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

340199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 547

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Garza v. Alviar · Cain v. Bain · Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co. · Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an officer fails or refuses to levy on or sell property subject to execution and the levy or sale could have taken place, the officer and his sureties are liable to the party entitled to receive the money collected on execution for the full amount of the debt, plus interest and costs. The total amount is recoverable on motion of the party filed with the court that issued the writ, following five days’ notice to the officer and his sureties.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that the jury's finding was against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.