Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 797 SW2D 184 - Crawford v. Williams

Crawford v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrow v. Corbin · Houston First American Savings v. Musick · Novak v. Stevens · Pullen v. Swanson · Estate of Devitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘[T]he lack of jurisdiction of the Trial Court over either the parties or the subject matter of the suit is a question of fundamental error which can be raised at any time by this court of its own volition. This Court has both the authority and it is its duty to consider fundamental error apparent on the face of the record although not assigned, and the exercise by the Trial Court of jurisdiction where none existed is fundamental error.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “legislature did not intend to expand probate court jurisdiction to matters other than those in which the controlling issue was the settlement, partition, or distribution of an estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.