State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2010
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · Anderson v. Charles · State v. Lingar · State v. Berry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. I asked him if he would be willing to give us a statement on videotape. Q. When you asked him that, what happened? A. He said that he thought he should talk to an attorney first. Q. Is that the first mention that he had made of wanting to talk to an attorney? A. Yes, sir, it is. Q. And when he asked to talk to an attorney, did you in fact make arrangements for him to do so? A. I did. Q. After that was completed, did you renew your request? A. No, sir. After he had talked to an attorney, he indicated he did not wish to make any further statement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.