Doak v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
798 F.3d 1096 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Jones v. Bernanke · Bowden v. United States · Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Spinelli , this court addressed the jurisdictional consequence of a plaintiff's wholesale failure to file an administrative complaint or to obtain any administrative decision at all.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i) she engaged in statutorily protected activity; (ii) she suffered a materially adverse action by her employer; and (iii) a causal link connects the two.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“final disposition of [an administrative] complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.