Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

798 F.3d 1242

Docket No. 10-16772.

Din v. Kerry

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 26, 2015.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2015-08-26

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2022

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 135 S. Ct. 2128 - Kerry v. Din

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-08-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Heidi C. Larson Howell, Sidley Austin LLP, Geoffrey D. Deboskey, Esquire, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Sin Yen Ling, Esquire, Asian Law Caucus, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶2lia C. Deiss, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Stacey llene Young, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for DefendantAppellee.

¶3Before: RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and RANER C. COLLINS, District Judge.

/798/f3d/1242 · .json · Public domain