Davis v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
798 F.3d 290 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department · 134 S. Ct. 1861 - Tolan v. Cotton · In re Josephson · Jones v. Blanas · Barker v. Norman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his is not to say that pro se plaintiffs don't have to submit competent evidence to avoid summary judgment, because they do.”). 5 . Gov't Fin. Servs. One Ltd. P'ship v. Peyton Place, Inc., 62 F.3d 767 , 774 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. 329.73 Acres of Land, More or Less, 695 F.2d 922 , 926 (5th Cir. 1983) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Davis testifies that jail staff told him that the grievance process [did not have an] option to appeal-and he, relying on that misrepresentation, did not file an appeal.... [W]e conclude that the second step of the jail's grievance process was unavailable to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Townsend v. Murphy“Grievance procedures are unavailable ... if the correctional facility's staff misled the inmate as to the existence or rules of the grievance process so as to cause the inmate to fail to exhaust such process”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross v. Blake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.