Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 F.3d 475 - Gevas v. McLaughlin

Gevas v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

798 F.3d 475 · 2015

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish · Sandin v. Conner · Brokaw v. Mercer County · McGill v. Duckworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the harm to which the prisoner was exposed must be an objectively serious one”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must have actual, and not merely constructive, knowledge of the risk.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.