Hart v. Mannina’s Empirical Analysis
798 F.3d 578 · 2015
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Barker v. Wingo · Franks v. Delaware · Neil v. Biggers · Heck v. Humphrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the length of the delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3) whether the defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial, and (4) any prejudice the defendant suffered by the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“denied that she coached any of the witnesses, and all four witnesses testified that they were neither coached nor otherwise led to identify”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In real-world investigations, police often confront the limits of human memory and facial recognition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.