Garcia v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
798 F.3d 876 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Alvarez-Santos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey · Ahmed v. Holder · Coronado v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the agency 'does not rely on an alien's conviction in denying [the requested] relief.' " Agonafer v. Sessions , 859 F.3d 1198 , 1202 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Morales v. Gonzales , 478 F.3d 972 , 980 (9th Cir. 2007) ); see also Garcia v. Lynch , 798 F.3d 876 , 881 (9th Cir. 2015) ("[T]he § 1252(a)(2)(C) bar does not apply to the denial of a procedural motion that rests on a ground independent of the conviction that triggers the bar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Flores v. Barr“no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flores v. Barr“review of constitutional claims or questions of law,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flores v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.