Arthur v. E.I. Du Pont’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2019
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Jackson v. Bair · Henry Whitcomb v. John a Smithson · Poulos Agp v. Naas Foods Incorporated Plc · Tedder v. F.M.C. Corp. · Weems v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there [is] any reasonable possibility that the judgment will be reversed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.