798 F. Supp. 415 - Ramirez v. Resolution Trust Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
May 1993
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1441A · 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on Reisman v. Caplin · Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Trade Commission · United States v. Ramirez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any such agency or any party to proceedings under this section may apply to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or the United States district court for the judicial district ... in which such proceeding is being conducted, or where the witness resides or carries on business, for enforcement of any subpoena or subpoena duces tecum issued pursuant to this subsection, and such courts shall have jurisdiction and power to order and require compliance therewith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where an agency must resort to judicial enforcement of its subpoenas, courts generally dismiss anticipatory actions filed by parties challenging such subpoenas as not being ripe for review because of the availability of an adequate remedy at law if, and when, the agency files an enforcement action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.