Wilkins v. Lujan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1 (National Park Police Drug Enforcement Supplemental Authority Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1331 · 16 U.S.C. § 15 · 16 U.S.C. § 3 · 16 U.S.C. § 460M (New River Gorge Boundary Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1402 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Sierra Club v. Morton · Heckler v. Chaney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the management of exotic species already present will be undertaken wherever such species threaten park resources or public health.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“for use and enjoyment of the outdoor recreation resources thereof by the people.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“natural values and objects of historic interest”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.