Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 NE2D 431 - Springer v. State

Springer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Beeman v. State · Majors v. Abell · 96 Ind. App. 287 - Coconower v. Stoddard · Hedrick v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall base its restitution order upon a consideration of: (1) property damages of the victim incurred as a result of the crime, based on the actual cost of repair (or replacement if repair is inappropriate); (2) medical and hospital costs incurred by the victim (before the date of sentencing) as a result of the crime; (3) the cost of medical laboratory tests to determine if the crime has caused the victim to contract a disease or other medical condition; (4) earnings lost by the victim (before the date of sentencing) as a result of the crime including earnings lost while the victim was hospitalized or participating in the investigation or trial of the crime; and (5) funeral, burial, or cremation costs incurred by the family or estate of a homicide victim as a result of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[n]egligence is the failure to do what a reasonably careful and prudent person would do under the same or similar circumstances or the doing of something that a reasonably careful and prudent person would not do under the same or similar circumstances. In other words, negligence is the failure to exercise reasonable or ordinary care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the General Assembly has not authorized the trial court to include this expense in its restitution order because none of the statutory restitution categories includes [sic] any language that could be construed to authorize it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.