Conger v. Tel Tech, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Brown v. North American Manufacturing Co. · 93 Ill. App. 3d 244 - Lundy v. Whiting Corp. · Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Armco Steel Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Unreasonably dangerous means that the product was dangerous to an extent beyond which would be contemplated by the ordinary and prudent buyer, consumer or user of that product in that community considering the product’s characteristics, propensities, risks, dangers and uses together with any actual knowledge, training, or experience possessed by that particular buyer, user or consumer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.