Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 P2D 327 - Vezey v. State

Vezey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 4 Cal. 3d 478 - Merced Irrigation District v. Woolstenhulme · United States v. Acres of Land More or Less in County of Monroe State of R · Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. State · Bridges v. Alaska Housing Authority · State v. Hammer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Full attorney's fees are the norm under Civil Rule 72(k), but those fees must be both reasonable and necessarily incurred to achieve just and adequate compensation for the owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The court may direct the payment of delinquent taxes and special assessments out of the amount determined to be just compensation....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen a trial court decides not to award full attorney's fees and costs it must state its reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.