Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 P.2d 889 - Baker v. Young

Baker v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Shaffer v. Heitner · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Rush v. Savchuk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The term “property” includes a multiplicity of interests and is commonly used to denote everything that is the subject of ownership, whether tangible or intangible, as well as those rights and interests which have value to the owner. See Black’s Law Dictionary 1095 (5th ed. 1979). The concept of property, therefore, encompasses those enforceable contractual rights that traditionally have been recognized as choses in action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Slo long as there are other constitutionally sufficient contacts between the nonresident defendant and the forum for the exercise of jurisdiction, a court may properly assert quasi in rem jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant to the extent of the defendamt's interest in the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “indulging in nothing less than strained and artificial refinement were we to now hold that this same contractual obligation does not qualify as property of the insured for the purpose of a court's assertion of quasi in rem jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.