798 So. 2d 1121 - McDaniel v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 643 So. 2d 1228 - Pfiffner v. Correa · 495 So. 2d 1298 - McLean v. Hunter · 556 So. 2d 276 - Soteropulos v. Schmidt · 601 So. 2d 1378 - Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. · 643 So. 2d 1236 - Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [I]t is a specialist's knowledge of the requisite subject matter, rather than the specialty within which the specialist practices, which determines whether a specialist may testify as to the degree of care which should be exercised. A particular specialist's knowledge of the subject matter on which he is to offer testimony is determined on a case by case basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prevail under such circumstances when a defendant/physician or a defense expert testifies regarding the standard of care, and the objective evidence at trial is such that a lay jury can infer negligence from the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where medical disciplines overlap, it is appropriate to allow a specialist in one field to give expert testimony as to the standard of care applicable to areas of the practice of medicine common to both disciplines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.