McCarty v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 451 So. 2d 579 - Gray v. Gray · 632 So. 2d 307 - Zatzkis v. Zatzkis · 423 So. 2d 758 - Vorisek v. Vorisek · 398 So. 2d 134 - Volker v. Volker · 563 So. 2d 1000 - Shenk v. Shenk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Such determinations will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion.' " Id. , (quoting Molony v. Harris , 09-1529, p. 2 (La. App. 4 Cir. 10/14/10), 51 So.3d 752 , 756 ). "Permanent alimony may cover such expenses as food, clothing, shelter, reasonable and necessary expenses for transportation, medical care, medication, utilities, household maintenance, and income tax liability arising from the alimony payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Thomas“However, this Court has held that permanent alimony should not cover such expenses as newspapers, gifts, recreation, vacations and church tithes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.