798 So. 2d 562 - Starks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 725 So. 2d 836 - Bell v. State · 749 So. 2d 123 - Sheffield v. State · 478 So. 2d 266 - Keys v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard for reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires us to view the credible evidence consistent with the verdict as true. On appeal all reasonable inferences are given to the prosecution once the jury has reached the guilty verdict. We may reverse only if the evidence considered in the light most favorable to the verdict simply would not convince reasonable and fair-minded jurors of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the existence of any direct evidence eliminates the need for a circumstantial evidence instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Arguelles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.