Mullikin v. State

Jared MULLIKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-11-06

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2002

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Cotton · 504 So. 2d 495 - Bloodworth v. State · 792 So. 2d 643 - Green v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant challenges the constitutionality of subsection 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1999) (commonly referred to as the "10/20/Life" Act). We affirm.

¶5This court has already rejected Appellant's separation of powers argument. See Green v. State,792 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We also reject his Cruel and Unusual Punishment and Due Process arguments without discussion. See, e.g., State v. Cotton,769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); Bloodworth v. State,504 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

¶6MINER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.