798 So. 2d 870 - Nardone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
64 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State · Cross v. State · 569 So. 2d 1225 - Floyd v. State · 522 So. 2d 802 - Jackson v. State · 127 So. 2d 453 - Mills v. Redwing Carriers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court's discretion is limited by the rules of evidence.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Hawker v. State“(1) The witness cannot readily, and with equal accuracy and adequacy, communicate what he or she has perceived to the trier of fact without testifying in terms of inferences or opinions and the witness’s use of inferences or opinions will not mislead the trier of fact to the prejudice of the objecting party; and (2) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“She opined that the aluminum strip could cause great bodily harm. See id. at 872 . The State asserted that this testimony was admissible as lay opinion based on the officer's familiarity with the type of object in question. See id. at 873 . However, citing section 90.701, the Fourth District Court in Nardone noted that a lay witness' opinion testimony is allowed only if it is based on”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.