Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 S.W.2d 368 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Ex Parte Duffy · Livingston v. State · McKay v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statement of the declarant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of declar-ant’s will.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.