Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 798 SW2D 521 - Morton v. Morton

Morton v. Morton’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 99 Cal. App. 3d 514 - In Re Marriage of Popenhager · In re the Marriage of Stigall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question presented is, does the granting of an amount of child support in a URESA action that is different from that ordered paid by a prior dissolution decree constitute a modification of the terms of the prior dissolution decree? Two statutes speak to this issue, §§ 454.105 and .280 [RSMo 1986]. Section 454.105 states: Participation in any proceeding under section 454.010 to 454.360 does not confer jurisdiction upon any court over any of the parties thereto in any other proceedings. Section 454.280 states: No order of support issued by a court of this state when acting as a responding state shall supersede any other order of support but the amounts for a particular period paid pursuant to either order shall be credited against amounts accruing or accrued for the same period under both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.