Timmel v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
799 F.2d 1083 · 1986
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably United States v. Pofahl (1993), United States v. DeFries (1997)
14 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1867
Relies on Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri · Castaneda v. Partida · Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ne incidence of a jury venire being disproportionate is not evidence of a 'systematic' exclusion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Defendant] must demonstrate . . . not only that [African-Americans] were not adequately represented on his jury but also that this was the general practice in other venires.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the group alleged to be excluded is a ‘distinctive’ group in the community; (2) that the representation of this group in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community; and (3) that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.