Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 1180 - Bohen v. City of East Chicago

Bohen v. City of East Chicago’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 1180 · 1986

Citation profile

311
cited by 311 later decisions
8
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

155 federal appellate · 22 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 311 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Andrews v. City of Philadelphia (1990), Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico (1988)

155 federal appellate · 22 district · 8 state decisions

161019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Batson v. Kentucky · Foman v. Davis · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 311 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he core of any equal protection case is, of course, a showing of intentional discrimination.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] trial judge is particularly well-situated to judge the worthiness of a plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint, having been involved in the progress of the case throughout its development and having viewed first-hand the party's diligence or lack thereof.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Sexual harassment of female employees by a state employer constitutes sex discrimination for purposes of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.