Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 131 - Adams v. Heckler

Adams v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 131 · 1986

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Dombrowski v. Pfister · Bloodsworth v. Heckler · Dietsch v. Schweiker · Watters v. Harris · Sheehan v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Appeals Council may dismiss a request for review if it is not filed within the stated time. 20 C.F.R. § 404.971 (1984). Such dismissal is binding and not subject to further review. Id. 404 .972. Such action does not address the merits of the claim, and thus cannot be considered appealable, as can the Appeals Council’s decisions and denials of timely requests for review. See id. § 404.981. As we stated in Sheehan, “If the claimant may obtain review in this situation [late filing of an appeal] the Secretary’s orderly procedures for processing disability claims mean little or nothing. If claimant may avoid the timely exhaustion of remedies requirement, any claimant could belatedly appeal his claim at any time and always obtain district court review of an ALJ’s decision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.