Souza v. Estate of Bishop’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States · Frey v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the long-term lease, in and of itself, created a barrier to the leasehold market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“conspiracy cannot usually be established by direct proof”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.