Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 1409 - Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel

Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 1409 · 1986

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp. (1987), Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Larson (1987)

56 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

6101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc. · Gooch v. Skelly Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this circuit, the standard for determining excusable neglect is a strict one.... Inadvertence or mistake of counsel, including that attributable to office staff, does not constitute excusable neglect.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he district court, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal....”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[l]ack of notice of the entry does not affect the time to appeal or relieve or authorize the court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed, except as permitted in Rule 8002”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.