Hart v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
799 F.2d 567 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382B (§ 1613 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on United States v. Larionoff · Yuckert v. Heckler · McCoog Ferguson v. Hegstrom · Sierra Club v. Clark · Deukmejian v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An agency's interpretation of its own regulations is entitled to considerable deference by the courts, unless the interpretation is unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“work[ ] an unduly harsh result in the name of an otherwise valid and laudable regulation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.