Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

799 F.2d 664

Docket No. 81-5365.

Payne v. Lyng

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Ronald E. PAYNE, Individually and on behalf of himself and others similarly situatedv.Richard E
  • LYNG, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, et alv.James J. COLLINS, Movant-Appellant-

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-09-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1986

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Lyng v. Payne · Payne v. Block · Payne v. Block

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard Olderman, Robert E. Kopp, Washington, D.C., for Block, FHA, Dept. of Agriculture.

William R. King, Haas, Holland, Lipshutz, Levison & Gibert, Atlanta, Ga., for Collins, movant-appellant-intervenor.

J. Victor Africano, Live Oak, Fla., Moorey, Seal & Garvin, Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., Fort Myers, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Before GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

The district court judgment in this case was affirmed by this court in Ronald E. Payne v. John R. Block, 714 F.2d 1510 (1983), 721 F.2d 741 (1983) and 751 F.2d 1191 (1985). The judgment of this court has now been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Richard E. Lyng v. Ronald E. Payne, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2333, 90 L.Ed.2d 921 (1986).

¶2

WHEREUPON, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

/799/f2d/664 · .json · Public domain