Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 681 - Anthony v. Franklin County

Anthony v. Franklin County’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 681 · 1986

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
May 2009
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster (1989), Spence v. Zimmerman (1989)

15 federal appellate ·

150198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas · Purcell v. Deli Man, Inc. · Ellison v. Georgia Railroad · Dowdell v. City of Apopka

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deprivation of a property interest for an improper motive and by means that were pretextual, arbitrary and capricious, and ... without any rational basis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a property owner has not suffered a violation of the just compensation clause until the owner has unsuccessfully attempted to obtain just compensation....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]conomic and social legislation is presumed valid if it is rationally related to a legitimate state interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.