Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 734 - Medtronic Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.

Medtronic Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 734 · 1986

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
September 2012
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant (1989), Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc. (1986)

7 federal appellate · 10 district ·

2501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 282

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Jones v. Howard · Jizmejian v. United States · Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court must consider all the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-mover, must draw reasonable inferences favorable to the non-mover, must not determine the credibility of witnesses, and must not substitute its choice for that of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the absence of objective evidence [of long felt need and commercial success] is a neutral factor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “has been correctly applied to the facts found.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.