Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 799 F.2d 976 - Fowler v. Carrollton Public Library

Fowler v. Carrollton Public Library’s Empirical Analysis

799 F.2d 976 · 1986

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
6
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Russell v. McKinney Hospital Venture (2000), Brown v. CSC Logic, Inc. (1996)

20 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

1701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Parratt v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to establish a cognizable claim of constructive discharge, a plaintiff must allege particular facts showing either that the employer found [himjself 'between the Scylla of voluntary resignation and the Charybdis of forced termination,’ or that 'the employment conduct ... [was] motivated by a desire to avoid subjecting its actions to the scrutiny of a termination-related hearing.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]onstructive discharge in a procedural due process case constitutes a § 1983 claim only if it amounts to forced discharge to avoid affording pretermination hearing procedures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Motivation presents a classic jury issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.